The entire movement is done in an unguarded way and thus invites the opportunity attack. to move away from a hostile creature in an unguarded way. It is not the movement itself, but the nature of the movement. Indeed, the presence of the Disengage action makes more clear why an opportunity attack happens. Second, it is not a logical inconsistency that an opportunity attack depends on moving out of reach but must take place before the creature is actually out of reach. There are clearly a number of specifics in the rules that offset the "moving out of reach" aspect that would normally allow an opportunity attack. Barbarian's third-level Eagle Spirit totem, which imposes disadvantage to opportunity attacks against the Barbarian). The creature moving also must do so without taking the Disengage action, and without having any other feature that would limit or eliminate opportunity attacks against them (e.g. That is a necessary but not sufficient condition. I disagree with the other answer that this is merely a technicality and that opportunity attacks could be allowed for this use of dimensional rift.įirst, I observe that an opportunity attack is not just about moving out of reach. An opportunity attack occurs "…when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach." The Boggle's withdrawal after an attack does not involve moving out of the target's reach, so no opportunity attack is made on that basis.
I agree with the rules interpretation of this answer.
0 kommentar(er)
